| Uploader: | Faulkis |
| Date Added: | 23 December 2011 |
| File Size: | 6.16 Mb |
| Operating Systems: | Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X |
| Downloads: | 55847 |
| Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
What we don't know is how many are, why, and what other kinds of traffic could potentially cause this issue. Word 0x30 isn't the important part -- that's just PXE nitel. Intel L Gigabit network card - issues and resolution I am posting this so that if anyone has the same problem they will know what to do. I'm having trouble believing that.
Find More Posts by add It turns out that if the first packet received contains any value that I can find other than 1, 2, or 3 the interface becomes immune from any death packets where the value is 2 or 3. Want to pqcket if that peripheral is compatible with Linux? With my packet Swiss army knife in hand I started poking and prodding.
Clement - The original phone was a Yealink T22, which due to some missing error checking on their part and misconfiguration on our part caused these packets to be sent more frequently than you would imagine. I'd like to confirm that I haven't just missed something in my testing. Note that registered members see ibtel ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in. While ijtel packets I experimented with various hex values.
I enjoyed it thoroughly.
I've shipped probably a hundred thousand of these parts, and the only time there were issues was when the EEPROM was bad. Looking at the how-to-reproduce pages If sold in bulk, price represents individual unit.
Intel Ethernet controller vulnerable to 'packet of death' | ZDNet
Yes of course sophisticated software might have its own bugs, inte here we start going in circles I have one machine that has the eeprom with ff ff at 0x, here's the output of ethtool -i: I have all potentially affected NICs on VLAN trunk ports - does that shield me from the issue generally, or do I just need to modify the reproducing capture in some way? For what it is worth, I was unable to kill devices on my home network that have packef Intel GB and V chipsets using tcpreplay-edit and the pcap files you provided.
Intel has a fix, they just need to release it. It actually reminded me about: What I found imtel shocking. Glad to see that Ostinato helped your investigations and dig down right upto the offending packet offset and values!
The response to these types of packwt is usually denial and secrecy, which is why the policy of full disclosure is so important - because inertia being what it is, there is significant resistance to simply not addressing these problems in the first place otherwise. From the responses I have received I'm certainly not the only person that can reproduce this issue with the L and this traffic.
Thanks pzcket the detailed info and resolution! With a modified HTTP server configured to generate the data at byte value based on headers, host, etc you could easily configure an HTTP response to contain the packet of death - and kill client machines behind firewalls!
Downloads for Intel® 82574 Gigabit Ethernet Controller
Wednesday, February 6, Packets of Death. What is the difference between Boxed and Tray Processors? I was lucky enough to find a very patient and helpful reseller in the field to stay on the phone with me for three hours while I collected data.
Refer to Datasheet for formal definitions of product properties and features. This is what happens with proprietary software. It broke down to something like this: The valuable bit appears to be 82547l word 0xf offset 0x1f
Comments
Post a Comment